🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to employ a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and upsetting the fine equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the maps created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling is part of a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create several additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party officials criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A top Democratic figure said the court had yet again eroded its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.