🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential risk to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

The Stark Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the EU. Over this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, about half of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening disparity is driven by superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity raises a pressing question: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a contest between two involving the US and China, with Europe entering at a clear handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hinder Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population, is split among twenty-seven different national systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, there are reasons for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable far greater levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations could trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.